The phone buzzes again: collection calls you don’t want to answer. The bills stack up. The amount owing grows. Maybe it’s credit cards, payday loans, or personal loans. Maybe it’s wage garnishments or threats of legal action from the federal government (CRA). If your bills keep outpacing your income and the stress is crushing, you are not alone.
At some point, you start searching for a way out. That’s when two options keep coming up: Consumer Proposal vs Division 1 Proposal. Both are legal tools under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, filed by Licensed Insolvency Trustees, and both can stop collection efforts in their tracks.
The difference? From how creditors vote to how your credit rating is affected, the rules aren’t the same. And whether you owe $40k in unsecured debts or run a business with unsecured creditors, knowing the fit can change your future.
Before We Start, A Quick Look at What Sets Division 1 and Consumer Proposal ApartBoth options are filed by a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) and trigger a stay of proceedings, which means collections, lawsuits, and wage and salary garnishments stop. Neither option is ‘better’; each is designed for different debt situations. |
| Category | Consumer Proposal (Division II) | Division I Proposal |
| Who it’s for | Individuals (not businesses) or a bankrupt with unsecured debt up to $250,000 (not counting a mortgage on your principal home) | Individuals with unsecured debt over $250,000, people with complex debt (multiple mortgages, landlords, business owners, prior proposal default), and incorporated businesses |
| How it starts | Filed by an LIT; consumer proposal prepared and sent to creditors | Filed by an LIT; First Meeting of Creditors must be held within 21 days |
| Creditor voting | Creditors vote within 45 days; accepted if 50% + $1 of proven claims say “yes” | Creditors vote at/after the First Meeting; needs a majority in number and two-thirds in value of proven claims |
| Court Approval | Deemed court approval under the Act (actual court appearance is very rare) | Requires court approval after creditor acceptance |
| Payments | If you miss three monthly payments or a non-monthly payment is more than 90 days late, your Consumer Proposal is deemed annulled automatically | More stringent: only one missed payment is allowed; a second missed payment can trigger default, and the Court may deem you bankrupt |
| Counselling | Two mandatory credit-counselling sessions | No mandatory sessions, but custom conditions can be included (e.g., therapy for gambling debt, tax compliance) |
| Outcomes | Often repay only a portion of unsecured debt, interest frozen, keep control of assets (unless terms say otherwise) | Restructures large/complex debts while avoiding bankruptcy; custom conditions possible; keep control of assets (unless terms say otherwise) |
| Director status | You can remain a director of a corporation | You can remain a director of a corporation |
| Risk if voting fails | If not accepted or later annulled, creditors’ rights resume | If no agreement is reached, the debtor may be deemed bankrupt (rare; negotiation usually comes first) |
These points reflect the rules and practical guidance BNA emphasizes for Alberta filers.
Flora is 34. She lives in Red Deer. She has $78,000 in unsecured debts: credit cards, a line of credit, personal loans, and payday loans that won’t quit. Her mortgage on her primary residence is current. The math doesn’t work anymore. She can pay something, not everything, with interest piling on.
Her goal:
The best option was a consumer proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, filed through a Licensed Insolvency Trustee: an interest-free settlement of the debt, paid by monthly payments.
Collection calls stopped; wage garnishments paused; she kept secured debts. She completed two financial counselling sessions.
Tanner is 45. He owns a small incorporated business in Calgary. After a tough year, he owes suppliers, landlords, and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Some of the money owed is tied to a corporate line, some to his personal guarantees. His total debts are well over $250,000 in unsecured loans, and his financial situation is complex.
His goal:
For Tanner, the right fit was a Division I Proposal. It’s built for larger, complex debts included in business cases. It still halts wage garnishments, protects most assets, and offers a path to debt relief without an automatic bankruptcy.
It still aims to protect assets and operations. It requires a First Meeting of Creditors and a court approval. Conditions can be customized to address creditor concerns, including the Division 1 proposal terms like tax compliance or reporting, to enhance the chances of acceptance.
The moment you file a Consumer Proposal or Division 1 Proposal, real change begins. Whether it’s a consumer proposal for unsecured debts or a Division I Proposal for more complex files, our licensed insolvency trustees (LITs) ensure the law works for you.
This is the biggest emotional win. It’s not magic; it’s the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act at work. It gives you space to avoid personal bankruptcy, rebuild your credit report, and take the first step toward a debt solution and a more stable future.
If your debt isn’t massive (≤$250,000) but still feels unmanageable, a Consumer Proposal might be the most effective legal alternative to bankruptcy.
A Consumer Proposal (Division II) is a legally binding option under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act for individuals with debts of $250,000 or less, excluding your principal mortgage. It freezes interest. One monthly payment. No court. Let’s break it down.
If you’re an insolvent person carrying debts under $250,000 (not counting the mortgage on your principal residence), and want a real debt solution without personal bankruptcy, this may be your path. It works best for those who want interest frozen, one predictable payment, and a chance to rebuild their credit rating.
Filed with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT), a consumer proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act pauses collection efforts, freezes interest, and sets realistic monthly payments so you can breathe.
When creditors agree, you gain structured debt relief without court days in most cases. This is how consumer proposal work actually feels in practice: you get breathing room, a single plan, and the law on your side.
Because consumer proposals freeze interest, reduce your payments, and begin credit recovery sooner. It’s a predictable debt solution that keeps secured assets in place while payments fit your budget.
Miss three payments, or delay more than 90 days, and the plan is deemed annulled. That means creditors regain rights, and you may need to file a Division I Proposal or face bankruptcy next. Discipline is key; this is what keeps the path to a debt-free life steady.
Some debt files are just… bigger. More moving parts, more people involved, more risk if things go sideways. That’s where a Division I Proposal comes in. It’s a formal restructuring tool under the Bankruptcy Insolvency Act for debts over $250,000, and for situations too complex for a standard division 2 or consumer proposal.
If your total debts or debt structure is just too big or tangled for a standard consumer proposal, this is where a Division 1 Proposal steps in.
Note: Though Division I can be used by businesses filing a corporate proposal, BNA focuses on helping individuals and small-business owners find a path forward.
It starts with clarity. Your Licensed Insolvency Trustee (LIT) maps out your financial situation. What’s owed, to whom, and what can realistically be paid. Then we move fast.
Meet the LIT and their team. Map the full picture: business, personal guarantees, tax, and suppliers.
You carry out the plan; keep operating if you’re a business; keep control of assets unless the terms say otherwise.
This isn’t quick-fix territory. The significant difference is flexibility when simpler tools won’t cut it.
The guardrails are tighter here because the stakes are higher.
In a Consumer Proposal, creditors have 45 days. If creditors holding more than half of the proven dollar value approve, the agreement binds everyone in that unsecured group. If creditors holding 25% of proven claims request it, a creditors’ meeting may be called.
On the other hand, creditors must meet within 21 days (meetings may be adjourned) in a Division 1 Proposal. Approval requires two criteria: 1) a majority in number, and 2) two-thirds in value of proven claims.
In both cases, creditors reject proposals less often than you might think. Negotiation is common when they seek improvements.
Once your proposal is accepted, whether it’s a Consumer Proposal or a Division 1 Proposal, true relief begins immediately. Certain protections and benefits activate right away, allowing you to breathe easier and focus on moving forward.
Success is about fit and discipline. Choose the right tool, then stick to it.
| Rule | Consumer Proposal | Division I Proposal |
| Maximum term | Up to 60 months | Set by proposal; often similar durations |
| Missed payments | Three missed → automatic annulment (or a lump sum 90 days late) | Only one missed allowance; it must be made up within 30 days. A second miss can trigger default, and you may be deemed bankrupt. |
| If things fail | Creditors regain rights; you may consider a Division I or bankruptcy | If the court rejects the plan and the agreement fails, you are deemed bankrupt |
Use this fit-first lens, not a “better/worse” mindset.
| Myth | Fact |
| “A proposal always means court.” | Consumer Proposals are usually deemed approved; court appearances are rare. Division I Proposals require court approval after creditor acceptance. |
| “If creditors don’t like it, you’re done.” | Most cases involve negotiation. Adjustments and counteroffers from creditors are common when creditors want changes. |
| “You lose control of everything.” | Proposals are designed so you generally keep control of assets (unless the terms say otherwise). |
| “Missed payments are no big deal.” | They are. Consumer: 3 misses = annulment. Division 1: A second miss can lead to default, and being deemed bankrupt. |
| “You can’t be a director in a proposal.” | You can remain a director in both Consumer and Division I Proposals. |
| Timeframe | Activities |
| Week 1 | File. The stay of proceedings starts. Payroll and operations stabilize. Work with LIT to prepare for the first creditors’ meeting. |
| Weeks 2–3 | First Meeting of Creditors within 21 days. Share the plan. Creditors discuss, ask questions, and vote or request changes. |
| Weeks 3–8 | Handle negotiations with LIT. Creditors may request tweaks, reporting, or milestones. If accepted, it is taken for the Court’s approval. |
| Months 3–6 | Deal is in place; execute. Continue serving customers and stabilizing vendors. Everyone watches the same scoreboard. |
| Year 1+ | Maintain discipline. Meet custom conditions, pay on time, and contact LIT early if issues arise. |
No two debt files are exactly alike. Some clients walk in with straightforward numbers. Others? Not so much. We’ve seen it all, from CRA demands to past proposal defaults, and helped shape plans that actually pass.
These are the kinds of real-world complexities that make fit more important than just choosing a label. It’s not about what sounds simpler — it’s about what works, legally and practically, for your financial situation.
Not sure where your situation fits? That’s okay. We offer free consultations, and we’ll help you figure it out. Contact us now →
If most of these are true, consider a Consumer Proposal:
If most of these are true, consider a Division I Proposal:
One recent reviewer summed it up simply: they felt heard, protected from “aggressive” institutions, and supported so much that they recommended friends who later thanked them. That’s the point of the system: clear rules, steady hands, real relief.
Here’s what they said –
Contacting BNA Debt Solutions for assistance to sort out my financial issues proved to be a smart decision. With their proposed solution, invaluable guidance and expertise, I was able to positively and effectively address my issues in a way I never thought of.
Their professional, courteous team communicated with me compassionately and efficiently. They clearly explained the initiatives and steps necessary, and they responded promptly to any concerns.
I felt taken care of and respectfully guided out of my financial predicament. It was a true pleasure to work with them. I highly recommend them. – Paul Muellner
Both paths are law-backed, trustee-led, and focused on stability. The right one is the one that lets you breathe today and stay steady tomorrow.
If you recognize yourself in Flora, Tanner, or somewhere in between, Talk to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. For a free consultation, bring debts, last year’s tax return, and a simple budget. Ask blunt questions:
You don’t need perfect paperwork to start the conversation. You just need the courage to pick a path that matches your real life and the discipline to walk it.